Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Before switching to the new kernel, consider whether you need the new features. Most important for ordinary users is the USB-support and the DVD-filesystems.
I have been using the test releases of 2.4.0 at work and they are really nice. My USB keyboard and mouse work very well (only when on the same chain though for some reason). The kernel seams to be stable though I haven't taxed it by any means. I think it is a step up neccesary for people with cutting-edge hardware but probably isn't neccesary for many.
Is the 2.4 Kernel faster? I have heard that it does support more features such as USB, but when you recompile the Kernel (I am still trying to work out how!), surely you can leave out the modules you dont need. Wouldn't this give you the same type of kernel as before (assuming you dont use the new features) but with a diferent number?
Please correct me if I am wrong, beacuse I am considering upgrading my Kernel from 2.2.16 to 2.4. Should I? Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
CragStar,
I noticed a marked speed improvment with the new kernel. Netwoking has been greatly improved as has SMP support. Most stock kernels come with a bunch of stuff that you don't need because the distro makers are going for compatability not speed. I made a post a little while ago about the improvments in the 2.4x kernel, you may want to search for it. I would say that if you are thinking of upgrading go for it. You will definately learn something and by the time 2.4x is actually released you will be an expert at upgrading your kernel so you'll be able to upgrade right away Just make sure to keep a copy of your old working kernel around as you may not get everything right the first time.
Heh, unfortunetly I learned the lesson Jeremy just taught you the hardware...ALWAYS leave a copy of the old kernel around, and for good measure, even update your boot loader so it can run off either the old one or the new one You will have less stress if you follow that advice
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.