LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-07-2001, 02:16 AM   #1
eraser
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2000
Location: US
Posts: 47

Rep: Reputation: 15
Question


I've heard that 6.2 is the best Red Hat, at least the most reliable, is that true?
 
Old 04-07-2001, 09:16 AM   #2
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,600

Rep: Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083
In my opinion 6.2 is much better than 7. RH7 is still a little buggy and ships with a broken compiler. IMHO 6.2 with the 2.4 kernel is the way to go if you want to install red hat.
 
Old 04-07-2001, 07:43 PM   #3
BrianG
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Distribution: Redhat 6.2/7.2 & FreeBSD 4.4
Posts: 108

Rep: Reputation: 15
anyone used 7.1 yet? d/l ing now. gonna try it out.
 
Old 04-09-2001, 06:35 AM   #4
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 269Reputation: 269Reputation: 269
Is there a RH 7.1 out? I must be out of it and in my own world right now. Where did you find version 7.1, its not on their website even?
 
Old 04-09-2001, 11:02 AM   #5
BrianG
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Distribution: Redhat 6.2/7.2 & FreeBSD 4.4
Posts: 108

Rep: Reputation: 15
Its in beta. Codename wolverine. 90% percent of the links I got were bad, so it was tough to get. but not impossible. I havent installed it yet, wanted to see what the responce was. If i recall corrctly, it also is called "Fisher".
 
Old 04-09-2001, 12:08 PM   #6
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 269Reputation: 269Reputation: 269
Oh yeah..I heard of it.....not too much time to download, well, not going to attempt it now that I moved and lost my cable modem connection. Oh well.
 
Old 04-17-2001, 06:25 PM   #7
russ023
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: 0
I have been using Redhat 7.0 with kernal 2.4.3 and Alcatel USB adsl & netscape 6 with realplayer , only other things i been using is vmware for unix and xmms mp3 player & limewire with gnutella and yes it is buggy. it hangs quite a bit actually. I might got back to Redhat 6.0 (unfortunately i dont have 6.1/6.2 on CD).
Not sure if its the way i am configuring things or the os.I recomiled for athlon optimisation and my sound & internet went completely, so had to go back to pentium 3 config in the kernal (i am running athlon p1000 cpu)
 
Old 04-24-2001, 10:02 AM   #8
killjoy
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Atlanta,GA
Distribution: Red Hat, Mandrake
Posts: 66

Rep: Reputation: 15
RH 7.1 or "Seawolf" is now avail. Installed it on an older box and it seems to be pretty stable. MUCH less buggy than 7.0. Get it at Red Hat or a mirror site.
 
Old 05-05-2001, 05:25 PM   #9
bfloeagle
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Location: Upstate New York
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 158

Rep: Reputation: 30
Question Well how about 7.1?

Well, now that RedHat 7.1 has been out for a while, is it worth upgrading from 6.2 to 7.1? Anyone have opinions on 7.1 when compared to 7.0? Better worse? Killjoy, you mentioned less buggy? What was fixed?
 
Old 05-07-2001, 08:21 AM   #10
killjoy
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Atlanta,GA
Distribution: Red Hat, Mandrake
Posts: 66

Rep: Reputation: 15
7.0 gave me a lot of problems with X, especially with blackbox-nearly impossible to configure with gdm, kept wanting to default to kdm and then fail at login. 7.1 seems much better. Has the newer version of Gnome (not helix) and a much cleaner install all the way around. I'm not sure about the compiler-I haven't seen anything that says the new gcc is out of beta yet, but it doesn't seem to give me any errors when building. Has a newer version of rpm, too. Netscape hangs a bit, but mozilla is there, and pretty stable( I like ).
 
Old 05-11-2001, 10:25 PM   #11
rabidundead
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Earth
Distribution: Trying to get GENTOO 2004.2 INSTALLED... Weeeee!!!!
Posts: 67

Rep: Reputation: 15
Talking SeaWolf da bomb!

(i give it five smiles)

the installer kicks.

the rpm manager needs a 'select all' for its packages and categories, but doesn't crash like mandrake 8.

rh needs to support grub, lilo has probs on some machines.

also installer could use an option to use the same 'selection' of package categories in update mode as it does in install mode (ie workstation, server, etc. and just install packages in these groups that aren't already on the system.) OR preselect packages in its already established update mode that are already detected on the system. (half the time, due to dependencies, i don't remember what's on my system already when i have to choose from over 1000 rpms)

but if this compromises its great functionality and stability, please excuse me.

ALL of the drivers i have need of are there, not forgotten about. and when i booted, for the first time EVER, i saw every status message go to [OK] instead of half of my devices complaining [FAILED]!!!!!!

this rocks, the kernel is awesome, and the bugs are OUT.

the ONLY real complaint i have is KDE 2, it has some major bugs with its panel. and some of the windows still have that annoying verticle line distortion in the toolbars. wish they'd fix that, but it's not redhat, its K.

gnome is so cool with that new eazel. a must have.

oh, yeah, redhat needs to put XKill on the desktop by default(or at least in the K Menu, and Footprint Menu). i can't count the number of times the panel crashed from simply trying to drag n drop an application shortcut onto my panel. i think where the flaws in the distro are is in the 3rd party. redhat going for a commercial status, rivalling ms windows, would do well to think about thing like this when designing their desktop defaults for inexperienced 'home pc' users who aren't technical. most people wouldn't even know about XKill if this was their first try at linux.

i have NEVER got linux to a working state so quickly EVER, and have NEVER had so FEW problems. this IS definitely my ms windows KILLER. say goodbye to your a**, BILL, cuz it's time to blow it to kingdom come!!!!!!

------------
Rabid Undead
" windows is truly that, pretty to look at, but breaks easily " :smash:
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Red Hat custom Kernel compilation mini-How-To for Red Hat 8-9 Thetargos Red Hat 431 04-13-2007 05:19 AM
Red Hat 9 to Red Hat EL Mozilla Migration Question rharvey@cox Linux - Software 2 01-13-2004 06:43 PM
Red Hat does not plan to release another product in the red hat linux line... Whitehat General 5 11-03-2003 06:33 PM
Red Hat Enterprise vs. Red Hat Linux Project RedHatMN Linux - Distributions 2 07-29-2003 04:16 AM
Red Hat 7.2... & a modem with Red Hat 7.1 driver support rahduku Linux - Distributions 1 02-14-2002 11:49 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration