LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-04-2001, 10:58 AM   #1
RSerling
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Unhappy


I compiled a monolithic kernel using RH7.1. The kernel boots, init starts, then it goes straight from:

INIT: version 2.78

to

INIT: Entering runlevel: 3

I then get a set of INIT respawning messages.

In the 'normal' bootup, the file systems are set up between the two INIT messages listed above. All that setup is done by the rc.sysinit script. I rebuilt init with the DEBUG flag set, and it indicated it was reading inittab and starting sysinit (which kicks off the rc.sysinit script), but there are no error messages.

I've added an echo statement at the front of rc.sysinit (right after all the header comments), and the echo is not displayed during boot.

The only clue I've found on the 'net is a message indicating Artur Skawina had a similar problem booting kernel 2.2.15, and the cause was that bash was failing because a file it was using (/etc/ld.so.preload) was empty, and it booted fine after the file was removed. My distribution doesn't have that file, so I'm wondering if something else is causing bash to fail, and whether there's any way I can find out what the problem is, short of rebuilding bash with DEBUG (if it has it, I haven't looked yet...)?

I'm not using any RAM disk, it's supposedly not needed for a monolithic kernel (with the drivers built in). The boot is finding and starting init, so I presume it's also finding and (trying to start) bash.

Why do I want a monolithic kernel? Yes, I know all the advantages of modular kernels, but I have my reasons... ;-)

My host is a bit old (486 with SCSI and IDE, I won't go into the details here), but I don't think it's a hardware related problem.

Thanks,

Gerry Jones
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is the Linux kernel a monolithic one? LinuxSeeker Linux - General 4 10-27-2004 07:58 PM
Any Drawbacks for building Monolithic Kernel linuxboy69 Linux - Software 5 08-26-2004 02:41 PM
building a monolithic kernel corbis_demon Linux - Newbie 1 07-14-2004 12:35 PM
linux is a monolithic kernel, but doesn't it have servers like a microkernel? sunowww Linux - General 4 03-15-2004 11:43 PM
monolithic kernel, avoiding lkms? m00 Linux - Security 3 11-11-2003 02:08 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration